Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas)

By: Chris | June 20th, 2007

572466368_e11b78cdb5_m.jpgThe Shenanigans:

Alright, yesterday there was some premature reporting of a Christian Chivu deal sending the Romanian to Internazionale and Roma spending more than half of the inherited sum (6.5m) on David Pizarro’s remaining half contract. I purported this myth so I apologize, but - in my defense - it was a pretty bullshit deal to say the least, and it was being reported by multiple sources. So if some people jumped the gun, well, it wasn’t entirely unjustified. The reported deal was Chivu for 12 million euros, nothing else. Which would mean the total transaction between Inter and Roma to swap Pizarro and Chivu would be: Pizarro + 5.5m for Christian Chivu. If it wasn’t for Rosella Sensi and Daniele Prade, I’m sure nobody would have believed it. However, the Roma management is known for making terrible decisions and losing tons of cash they should have pocketed (see: Antonio Cassano).

As for the real happenings, Roma officially acquired the rest of Pizarro’s contract for 5.75m euros, so here’s to hoping he sustains a lengthy, nagging injury and Aquilaninho gets his much deserved place in the starting XI. You know how I feel about Pizarro, I think this is the worst piece of business Roma could have done (12.25m for David, any takers? annnnny takers? didn’t think so) this summer outside of selling Chivu for 50% of his value, which they still may do. Though I will give them credit for getting him at 5.75m, because Inter wanted 6.5m and Roma was offering 5.5m they “won,” even though they really lost. Luckily the payments will be made over 3 years so there is very little hit to this year’s transfer budget, just Aquilaninho’s development. Regarding Chivu, the official website has issued a statement saying there have been no negotiations regarding Chivu and Inter and the only discussions involved Pizarro. That’s a relief, but there’s still ample time for Sensi and Prade to fuck this up. And they’ll damn sure do their best.

For the current dealings, Roma will go to envelopes with two players today as far as I can tell. Since Lega Calcio is in a league of its own regarding contract dealings, here’s a quick summary of how envelopes and co-ownership works. If you know how they work, trust me and skip the next two paragraphs. Even if you don’t know how it works, you may want to skip the next two paragraphs anyway. You’ll thank me later.

Co-ownership: Essentially Italian football’s version of lay-away. When two clubs agree to sell 50% of a player’s contract to a team in return for half an agreed value for said player. That player is then property of both teams, and the two teams agree on a “loan” period for which the player will play for the purchasing team. The deal is typically for a previously determined number of years (typically 1-3) and after that initially agreed upon period has ended, the clubs revisit negotiations to come to a mutual agreement. There is a deadline every year for each co-ownership issue to be resolved (this year’s date is, whaddya know, today) and if no mutual accord is agreed upon, the deal goes to a blind auction or “envelopes.”
Example: Roma bought 50% of Marco Cassetti’s contract from Lecce last season for a little over 1.5m euros. Because the agreed period is over, they now have to revisit negotiations with Lecce to figure out what to do next season. Lecce can either a) continue co-ownership for another season b) sell Roma the remaining half of Marco for an agreed upon price c) buy back the 50% they sold to Roma last season for an agreed upon price or d) come to an agreement with Roma where both clubs agree to sell Marco to a third club and split the profits. There’s also the more complicated issue of one club selling their half to another third party club. In other words, it’s complex and only works in a place like Italy.

Envelopes: Also known as a blind auction or le buste, it occurs when two teams cannot come to an accord by a specific date. Then each club is given an envelope in which they put a specific written offer without the other club knowing the number (I’m not sure if this is how it’s physically done but you get the idea). After each club has submitted an offer, the club with the higher offer “wins” and buys the remaining half of the player’s contract from the other club. Quite simple.
Example: Roma and Lecce cannot come to an agreement over Marco Cassetti. They each submit an offer for Marco in an envelope. If Roma submits 1.25m and Lecce submits 1m, then Roma has to pay 1.25m to Lecce for the full rights of Marco. If Roma offers 1m and Lecce offers 1.25m, Marco becomes Lecce property again. And I have no clue what happens in the event of a tie, so don’t ask.

Everybody good? Moving on.

So, it looks like Roma will be going to envelopes with Lecce over Cassetti and Torino over Gianluca Comotto.

Per Le Buste

Marco Cassetti: No clue how this will play out. Roma paid 1.5m euros for half last summer and he played very well for Roma this past year. I’m a little confused as to why this is going to envelopes in the first place. My first guess would be he stays in Rome, but I was also pretty sure he wouldn’t be going to blind auction. Who knows.
Gianluca Comotto: Spent the last two years at Torino and had his half-ownership purchased outright last year for 1.2m. Apparently if Roma wins the auction he will be come part of the Esposito deal and immediately be shipped to Sardinia. Works for me - though I think Torino will bid high enough to keep him.

How would I have played out the Pizarro situation? I would’ve offered a euro and nothing more. I don’t even think he’s worth any more than the 6.5m Roma paid for him last season - and you will find many many people outside of Rome who feel the same way. He might be a playmaker but there are two sides to the ball, and preventing goals is just as important as scoring - unless you’re Barca. At which point you can say “fuck defense” and give Messi a Red Bull and the ball. Can you imagine how may goals Messi would score if he truly became like his idol, Maradona, and started snorting mounds of cocaine? Like at half-time, just pulled a Tony Montana and stuck his face in a pile of Colombian pure? He’d probably score 50 a season. Someone give Bobo Vieri’s number to Barca. The world needs this to happen. And yes, I just turned half of David Pizarro’s contract into Lionel Messi swan-diving into a pile of china white. I’m not sure what to do with myself sometimes.

I can’t wait until today is over and some stuff is settled.

The Rest Of It:
I) Rumors are flying Roma have agreed on a deal with Cagliari for Mauro Esposito. The suppposed deal is half of Gianluca Curci, Daniele Gallopa (or Gianluca Comotto if Roma wins the auction) and 3 million for Esposito and likely Antonio Chimenti. I’ll know much more soon, but the determining factor is whether or not it is a loan for Curci or co-ownership. Curci could well be worth more than Esposito very very soon. There is a question as to whether Esposito will choose Roma (Champions League) or Napoli (hometown) and it will take a little time to sort the whole situation out.

That’s exactly what I was looking for, more indecision.

II) As reported by the Queen of Party-Pooping, Martha, Bobo Vieri is drawing significant interest from Serie A’s resident nuck-futter, Maurizio Zamparini. Seriously, Martha, you couldn’t even let me have a week with my Bobo fantasies. Do you enjoy dashing people’s hopes and dreams? Do you also murder three-legged kittens with Mido in your spare time? Whadafuxup?

Please come to Rome, Bobo. Please. (I’m messin, Martha’s way awesome.)

III) Quote of the day:

Marco Amelia’s agent has revealed that his client is ready for a Lazio move, despite the Biancocelesti’s unawareness on the issue.

Well, that’s gonna be awkward for somebody. Kind of like that annoying kid who always used to invite himself over to your house after school everyday. Alright, I’ll admit I did it. But I was in elementary school and he had Goldeneye for N64 and Playboys, which I read for the articles. Stop acting like you wouldn’t do the same. I didn’t even like the kid. He got someone to hang out with, I got James Bond and Jenny McCarthy - a lethal lethal duo in the mid-90’s. Everybody won. Moving on….

All this from Marco after saying he would love to come back to play for Roma? Seriously? Come on bro. I can understand turning on the team that dumped you as a pup, but to be alright with either Lazio or Roma? Amelia and Franco Semioli need to get some IV drips of Midol and Ghirardelli chocolate. Man up, fellas.

IV) While I was diving through the endless rantings of distressed Roma fans on message boards yesterday, I came upon this video detailing David Pizarro’s playmaking abilities. I sincerely apologize and retract my statement that Pizarro isn’t worth 13m. The ease with which he can lay the ball on an attacker’s foot, just a whisker from the keeper’s outstretched arm, is astounding. The pace and touch on the ball was timed with nary a sign of imperfection. David Pizarro is truly a midfield maestro of highest regard.

Zizou, eat your heart out.

* - To those who questioned Pizarro’s worth, it was around 8m euros (Stats Inc. is pretty good, no?). UEFA rated it at 10m including half of Goran Pandev, but co-ownership worth is speculative in such cases. Yes, Pandev was part of the deal but this was in 2005 when Pandev had yet to play above Serie C1 and had scored a whopping 7 goals in three years in the third tier, he was never valued much at all. There were some Italian & Chilean web sites regurgitating the same thing, a deal around 8-9m plus Pandev’s nearly non-existent half. Also from ESPN:

Among the usual suspects for the 8m euro rated Pizarro are player-collectors like Inter (whose owner Massimo Moratti is said to be a great admirer of him), Roma, Juventus, possibly Parma, Deportivo La Coruna and Real Betis.

Next time somebody questions a source please make it less difficult than how much Udinese sold David Pizarro for 2 years ago. Nobody in the media exactly gave a fuck, especially the English-speaking variety, and it wasn’t easy finding it. Thanks.

V) Apparently Roma have sold off Damiano Ferronetti to Parma, where he has been playing recently. Unfortunately he was a pretty good prospect and a big part of the Azzurrini setup but had major injuries (back I believe) derail his career and has been making a “comeback” of sorts with Parma, even though he’s still young. I liked Damiano but staying at Parma is best for him. The reported deal is something like 350,000 euros. Works for me.

VI) Roma has received 500,000 euros from Siena for the outright purchase of Daniele Corvia. It may be a small sum but it’s nice to see the money adding up little by little coming in here. A few youth team products who would never see a day in the Giallorossi kit can be used to pay for guys like Barusso, Modesto, Cassetti, etc. Guys who will come in on relatively short money. It works out well for everybody. People helping people.

VII) Julien Faubert’s agent did an interview with an Italian radio station and mentioned Roma’s interest was still there, but nothing was in place at the moment. That’s nice and all, but the other part he mentioned was dreamy. Another of his clients has been discussed also with Roma and the agent maintained he was waiting to hear more from them. That client is Taye Taiwo, left-back from Marseille. And he is a fucking phenom extraordinaire. I’m not getting my hopes up (not much was made of the interest), he’d cost more than Faubert, but this kid is a superstar waiting in the wings. I would gladly sacrifice buying Fab Quag’s for him. He makes Ahmed Barusso look like David Pizarro. Exactly.

I’m sure there’s more but I’m way past flustered after the 24 hours of Roma news we’ve seen. Tuttomercatoweb has even crashed due to the plethora of absurdity running amok in the boot right now. I’m sure Rosella and Prade will send Totti to Lazio for a man-purse and a manicure just to spite me today. Enjoy the chaos.




Category Category: Team News

Subscribe
 

rss_icon The Offside RSS Feeds

Print
Print article
Share
del.icio.us:Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas) digg:Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas) reddit:Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas) fark:Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas) Y!:Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas) stumbleupon:Pizarro, Chivu & Le Buste (Holy Christmas)

Comments  

    Displaying the most recent 25 comments from a total of 45 comments.
    Read the rest of the comments

  • Martha |  June 20th, 2007 at 1:05 pm

    cornercorner

    Thank you, they’ll be here all night. Try the veal!

    (I’m not sure how suspending Suazo for sketchy dealings with Inter does them any harm, if he’s going to stay with Milan.)

    Posted from Portugal Portugal

    cornercorner
  • marco |  June 20th, 2007 at 1:21 pm

    cornercorner

    I just read on calciomercato that the Inter-Suazo deal isn’t final after all. Does this mean that there’s still hope?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Chris |  June 20th, 2007 at 1:33 pm

    cornercorner

    Martha, I think Inter could be subject to fines and sanctions. At least that’s what the Italian press is reporting. It’s essentially the same thing as what Roma pulled with Mexes, only Inter doesn’t get to keep him. It’s still pretty illegal to sign someone to a contract knowing full well they’re still under another contract.

    Marco, not really. Milan have done things legally (this time) and have already agreed terms with Cagliari and possibly Suazo. He was thisclose to signing for Milan this January anyway.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • oscar |  June 20th, 2007 at 1:53 pm

    cornercorner

    Chris, as much as I love the opportunistic look at the Suazo developments, it’s probably not worth getting any hopes up. On the off chance that Inter even gets beaten up over this, we should remember that our own embargo came a full year after we signed Mexès. So whatever punishment Inter could stand to get–and even this I don’t see happening, they have more juice than us–wouldn’t interest us since Chivu would be little more than a memory for our physiotherapist by then.

    Posted from Sweden Sweden

    cornercorner
  • oscar |  June 20th, 2007 at 1:54 pm

    cornercorner

    Oh, I kind of wrote that already above, I see. My bad, and all that.

    Posted from Sweden Sweden

    cornercorner
  • Chris |  June 20th, 2007 at 2:43 pm

    cornercorner

    Can’t anybody let me have my moment is the sun? What’s with all the party-poopers?

    Heavy rumors are emanating from Rome that Juan and Mauro Esposito will be unveiled tomorrow and Roma will likely win Cassetti but lose Comotto to Torino.

    For those scoring at home: About 10.5-11m for the trio coming in and 1.5m for Comotto. We’ll ball park it at 9m. One high-quality defender, one talented winger and a very very good platoon player while losing a player who never played for you (Galoppa/Curci loan/co-own too) for 9m net?

    Wait….was that good business from Roma?

    No………….

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Juan Carlos Sol |  June 20th, 2007 at 2:57 pm

    cornercorner

    it’s nice that you keep using that mistake against Pizarro, but never show any of his great assits, or one of his goals or any of his great dribbling and long passes… you rate Pizarro way to little, he is a very good player and takes our team above a level that Aquilani could not right now… they are going to share a lot of playing time anyways

    Posted from El Salvador El Salvador

    cornercorner
  • Vlad |  June 20th, 2007 at 3:17 pm

    cornercorner

    yea, either way there was a whole article on ilRomanista, well it was one of thus opinion columns at the side, that talked about how Aquilani can’t replace Pizarro right now, not because he’s not good enough, but because they are completely different players, and Roma need Pizarro badly right now. I also think 12-13 million is too much for him, but he’s one of the best in the world at his role.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Stefan |  June 20th, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    cornercorner

    Aquilani Rules , theres anothe guy with a hard shot he broke that kids arm because it was so hard lol. Hope Roma are still going for Quag and Juan. Esposito is pretty good but i bet Roma will make him better, for me he looks abit like Inzaghi.Also getting Faubert would be a great idea hes just what Roma needs incase a player gets injured.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Chris |  June 20th, 2007 at 3:28 pm

    cornercorner

    JCS,

    I have honestly searched for anything I can find on Pizarro on assists, passing and dribbling, but the fact is there is almost none (though there is plenty with Aquilani and Taddei especially). The fact is he doesn’t get involved enough with this team when it matters, meaning plays that matter enough to be on a video reel. And when his only job is a playmaker, shouldn’t that be exactly the result? I’m not below admitting I’m wrong, but this is the one aspect of Roma that I have a serious problem with. My biggest vision of Pizarro is the gaping holes left in the center of the midfield on counter attack when De Rossi pushes up because he cannot stop anybody. This team doesn’t have a set offense, and that’s what Pizarro was made for. He doesn’t bring this team to another level, the play from the wings does. I hope I’m wrong, and I’d love to see him succeed with Roma. But I really feel he is easily replaceable and a poor investment in money and playing time.

    And this quote:

    “they are going to share a lot of playing time anyways”

    Is that what you want from a 12m euro investment?

    I’m not trying to start a debate, I’d love for him to prove me wrong and really bring this team to another level. But most people haven’t seen it and the statistics haven’t displayed it. But I am glad you’re banging the drum for a Roma player when someone talks little of them, even if it’s me.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Inara |  June 20th, 2007 at 5:48 pm

    cornercorner

    So I read over your explanation of co-ownership and envelopes, and me being the simple creature I am, who follows a league where a club either owns a player or doesn’t, I have to ask, instead of offering co-ownership, why can’t the player simply go out on loan? At the end, it amounts to the same thing, right?

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • V |  June 20th, 2007 at 6:04 pm

    cornercorner

    I would love it if someone could find the video of Pizarro’s dive against Olympiakos in the CL group stage this year…and the subsequent act that he put on for the following minute before he received a yellow from the ref…not to totally knock Pizarro, but when he plays poorly, it really seems to stick out for some reason.

    Posted from Canada Canada

    cornercorner
  • Chris |  June 20th, 2007 at 6:05 pm

    cornercorner

    Inara, did you really just ask for logic from Lega Calcio?

    Silly goose.

    (That’s a yes, btw)

    V - I didn’t see that Olympiakos game but he did a similar dive during the Shakhtar Donetsk game where he got a yellow, unless that’s the game you were referring to. Here’s the video, 8:14 mark:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTcDYTX9ecE

    That was a pretty brutal dive.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Vlad |  June 20th, 2007 at 7:48 pm

    cornercorner

    Wowow did you guys see Marica’s crazy dribbling at the 0:59 mark? Man we gotta get him. Yea that dive was terrible compared to Inzaghi and Cris Ronaldo’s, but Pizarro had a really nice goal and another nice shot.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Juan Carlos Sol |  June 20th, 2007 at 9:29 pm

    cornercorner

    12 mill for a player of his abilities is not too much, it is just right… Pizarro is very important for our team right now and Spalletti knows it…so 7 assits is not good enough for you from a player that plays wayyyy back in the field? he doesn’t go up front very much and still managed 7 assists in a league were 11 was capoassister jajaaj dunno…

    so I guess this great goal against Milan stands for nothing?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK96BF528dk

    him playing with chile

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__4oOsWWcHM

    it’s true there is not many videos on pizarro but he has great abilities and to lose him would be a huge! blow… I think he will prove himself to you this season chris, I know he will… Did you see the Coppa italia game against INter in wich Aquilani started and had to be subed for an injured Pizarro and instantly got back in the game?

    Posted from El Salvador El Salvador

    cornercorner
  • V |  June 20th, 2007 at 9:42 pm

    cornercorner

    Thx Chris, that was the one I was referring to.

    Posted from Canada Canada

    cornercorner
  • Ant |  June 20th, 2007 at 11:02 pm

    cornercorner

    First, I’ve been following the commentary for a few weeks now, and compliments are due you, Chris, on the creative analysis of an often unreadable Italian transfer market. And for the laughs too.

    Second, I had to throw more wood on all this Pizarro fire. Seems like hatred for him is inversely proportionate to love for Aquilani. I never saw it that way. I’d buy an Aquilani jersey first, but I’m still happy to see the other half of Pizarro come into Roma’s hands. No one wants me to regurgitate reasons, but you said you were looking for evidence that he can dribble/pass/assist. I submit this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pK96BF528dk

    It’s worth a watch just for the announcer’s “Bye, bye Milan.” I’m surprised more people don’t remember combinations like this from last season. I’ve always considered Pizarro an asset further up the field.

    As for his defensive skills–here’s to hoping more were included in that Inter deal.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Chris |  June 20th, 2007 at 11:09 pm

    cornercorner

    Aquilani’s year this year was essentially a lost season, 9 starts and 4 substitute appearances due to injuries. You’re also forgetting he’s 22 years old. He’s only improving, Pizarro has almost definitely peaked and Aquilani is much much more talented than he is, nobody can deny that.

    I’m not denying Pizarro can do everything you mention, the fact is the Roma goals don’t come from him. They come from the wings, and he’s about as tall as a circus midget so he’s essentially a spectator in those situations because he surely can’t head anything.

    You continually mention his dribbling and passing. I’ll never say he can’t do those things. But show me something that dictates he isn’t a defensive liability and maybe I’ll think twice. The fact is his defensive shortcomings probably conceded as many goals as he created. My god have you seen the open space in midfield when he’s supposed to drop back (especially against ManU)? You could land a fucking plane with that much open grass.

    Watch this video and tell where you see Pizarro ANYWHERE on these goals. Your DM isn’t even in the picture, unless he’s jogging lazily back to avoid doing any defensive duties. I’m sorry but he is horrible on defense. Just horrible. He’s small, he’s slow and he’s lazy. Luckily I think Aquilani and Barusso will bench him by the end of the season.

    http://www.dailymotion.com/relevance/search/united%2Broma/video/x1okhv_manchester-united-v-roma-all-the-go

    Btw, thanks Ant and welcome. I’m always looking for dissenting opinions. With a 20m transfer budget we can do little else but rip each other’s heads off about Pizarro and Aquilani.

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Demandred |  June 21st, 2007 at 12:30 am

    cornercorner

    I’ve been reading this blog for a few weeks and decided to give my 2 cents worth on the Pizarro debate. For me he’s a very good player, worth his 12 mln. price tag. He’s the one who’s dictatitng the tempo, spreading the play around, keeping possession and starting the attacking moves for us, finding the wingers in good positions, etc. Maybe he doesn’t have that many direct assits, but that’s not his main responsibility. There’s a reason why Spalletti relies on him so much - because he adds a lot to our team. Now we are able to play a much more varied way than last year, when we were essentially a counterattack only team. One other thing - sure, most of our goals may come from the wings, but that doesn’t mean Pizarro plays no part in them. Quite often this season Pizarro has kept the ball near the centreline at one side of the field, attracted a few opposition players, then send a perfect long pass to a winger or a fullback on the other side of the pitch, who thnaks to this has a lot of space open and can make an assist or at least create some danger.

    I also disagree Pizarro’s that bad at defeinding. Sure this is not his greatest strenght, but he works a lot in defence, positions himself prety well and recovers a decent amount of balls. His small size is a problem of course, but alongside a quality DM he does a good job in helping the defence IMO.

    I also don’t think Aquilani is ready to be a first team starter. Everyone is talking how great he did against Inter in the Supercoppa and against Mialn at San Siro last year, but they forget that apart from that he didn’t impress in any game last season and struggled a lot against some pretty poor Seria A teams.Aquilani is also a very different player from Pizarro, they have different qualities to offer. Aquilani is more dynamic, he’s always looking for risky vertical passes and pushing forward. Which is great sometimes, but when he’s not at his best is really hurting the team because it leads to losing possession too often. Aquilani for me is more of a Perrotta type player, he moves well off the ball, good finisher for a midfielder and have a good shot. Aquilani and Pizarro can compliment each other very well on the field, I don’t see why there should be a choise between them. We need to have more options in midfield and having both Pizarro and Aquilani in the squad gives us a lot of tactical variaty.

    BTW, I am pretty sure Pizarro was bought by Inter for 10 mln. plus 50% of pandev, who by that time was already starting to make a name for himself at Lazio.

    Anyway, keep up the good work on this blog. It’s very helpful, informative and also hilarious to read.

    Posted from Bulgaria Bulgaria

    cornercorner
  • FlackAttack |  June 21st, 2007 at 12:41 am

    cornercorner

    Chris,

    UPDATE on Quags - you stated that his card was bought out at around 6m euros for the second half of ownership.

    According to tutto sport its going to “Le Buste” and it seems that UDINESE may have won!

    I live about 40 minutes from UDINE and I guess it would be cool to see Quags frequently but A) I fucking HATE Udinese and B) I am a Romanista and would rather he play for us.

    If he goes to Udinese, Ciao…. non succede mai che venisse da noi.

    Serie A

    Quagliarella: la busta sembra dire Udinese
    20.06.2007 23.03 di Francesco Letizia
    Secondo le indiscrezioni raccolte dall’esperto di mercato Luca Cattani di Antenna 3, Fabio Quagliarella dovrebbe andare all’Udinese che avrebbe offerto 7 milioni contro i 6.3 della Sampdoria.

    Also, not a big gripe but you must really hate Pizzaro!

    I have to disagree. He is not a bad player and of course I agree that there are two sides of the ball and he lacks on defense, but that is what De Rossi is for and being that Roma is one of the smallest of the “Big clubs” we need depth as well. Especially with the schedule including Champions League and the Defense of Coppa Italia. Aquilaninho will definitely get his share of play time and will not hurt his development whatsoever.

    Secondly, BOBO? Come on. I take this as a joke. You are joking, right? Please be joking.

    Thirdly, I agree with another fan of yours who said you need to copyright “roman clusterfuck”. I use your saying all the time, though I can’t really find a good translation to use when I am speaking ITalian. I would like to propose that you add “Aquilaninho” to the copyright as well! :-)

    Last of all, on tuttosport they are reporting a new scandal “Calciopoli DUE” that Inter may have to give up the scudetto that they took from JUVE (that would then become ours…FORZA ROMA) and or they could be relegated to B. That would be Awesome.

    Here is the script since I know u speak italian-

    E’ un titolo che fara’ tremare le gambe a tutti i tifosi nerazzurri quello di TUTTOSPORT oggi in edicola. Nel sottotitolo possiamo leggere: “scoppia lo scandalo dei bilanci truccati, implicato anche il Milan”.
    L’inchiesta della procura di Milano accelera dopo la consegna della relazione di un consulente della COVISOC e scatena un terremoto in FIGC.
    Possibile revoca dello scudetto soffiato alla Juve; penalizzazione o retrocessione, questi i rischi che corre l’Inter secondo il quotidiano torinese.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Corey |  June 21st, 2007 at 6:16 am

    cornercorner

    Ant you make a valid point, and what me and i think chris have argued is aquilani has more to offer defensively while being able to do the things pizarro does everyday, and Aquilani has room for improvement, so in the long run Aquilani is the better bet. Pizarro should not hinder the development of Aquilani, which is why i didnt want him back at Roma, but now that he is, he can be a role player but i feel like he wont have as much contribution as last year injuries to other players permittting.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • Chris |  June 21st, 2007 at 7:33 am

    cornercorner

    Pizarro - I’m done for now.

    Quags - We’ll call Tuesday “Jumping The Gun Day” because thats what the entire press did with Chivu and Quags. :)

    Btw, reports are saying Fab Quags will be sent to Juve ASAP. What happened to that whole starting spot thing?

    Calciopoli due - I saw that yesterday. I’m not sure if they’d actually hand that scudetto over to Roma but I don’t think I want it anyway. That thing seems cursed. No?

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • $+efan |  June 21st, 2007 at 8:20 am

    cornercorner

    If Quagliarella goes to juve instead of Roma , im going to cry. Hes perfect for Roma and now UDINESE got him watch there going to sell him to juve . dammit

    Posted from United States

    cornercorner
  • Bashar Beiruti |  June 21st, 2007 at 8:47 am

    cornercorner

    The way I see the scudetto.. the 2005-2006 one should be voided if Inter are found guilty..

    But since they would not have been able to partake in the 2005-2006 season they wouldn’t have been able to sign the great players that won them the 2006-2007 title. That one should be Roma’s.

    Posted from United States United States

    cornercorner
  • oscar |  June 21st, 2007 at 8:58 am

    cornercorner

    Now Capello smugly claims Roma should be given the 2006 scudetto…if that’s not reason enough to shun the damn thing I don’t know what is. No favours from the facha!

    Not that I’d want it anyway, it would inarguably be even more ridiculous than Inter accepting it.

    Oh, and on Pizarro I’m with Demandred. I don’t believe in blind faith, but I trust Spalletti if he’s this much in love with him.

    Posted from Sweden Sweden

    cornercorner

Comments are closed


Roma Forums

Voice your opinion on the latest Roma news at our Roma Forums


Italy National Team News

Tickets to upcoming games


Offside RSS Feeds

Search The Offside


 

rounded_corners



Categories


rounded_corners

Send Your Tips!

Found a great story, photo or video that's perfect for The Offside?
Email roma[at]theoffside[dot]com

Related Links


Write for The Offside

LATEST COMMENTS


Archives